Beautiful, but lacking in power.
Posted By:
Rainyday2012
(7/27/2009 11:22:46 PM)
7 mana is too much for something that would be much more useful on a smaller body early on. This is not a very good card.
But dang is that angel beautiful.
Posted By:
SleetFox
(9/10/2010 11:21:15 PM)
Really beautiful card and cool ability, but it's just not something I'd be willing to spend 7 mana for.
Posted By:
raptorjesus69
(6/26/2010 7:59:53 PM)
free creature to sac or chump block + 4 to the dome if dude has nothing in the air...i'd pay 7 for it
Posted By:
Laguz
(8/9/2009 5:42:57 PM)
shes like a prettier and flying version of verdant force
Posted By:
spoonish
(8/1/2009 11:44:42 PM)
Could help in a spirit deck I guess, not all that great though.
Posted By:
VoidedNote
(8/1/2010 12:16:43 AM)
too spensive
Posted By:
Kindulas
(1/6/2011 10:14:29 PM)
MUCH better, art and flavor text make a world of difference, so I'll boost this rating up to 2.5/5.
Also, it's good art because unlike most angels, it's not exactly sexy, but still amazing-looking, it feels almost like a young mother or something, there to help and not to just be a slut. Yes, I'm a straight male, but I don't constantly think about sex. Perfect art.
Posted By:
Shadoflaam
(6/4/2011 1:36:42 PM)
Far to expensive for its abilities (which are sub-par). I would play Emeria Angel any day of the week. This, not so much...
Posted By:
Demonic_Math_Tutor
(8/6/2011 6:54:07 AM)
Emeria Angel has nothing on this in a Kaalia deck. For the low, low price of FREE! you drop this on turn four, and your token making Angel slot is filled by a much more attractive creature with much more epic tokens.
Posted By:
DarthParallax
(8/11/2011 10:04:43 PM)