You might be better off with Infiltration Lens.
Posted By:
Gelzo
(1/5/2011 10:22:06 PM)
I wouldn't have seen it myself, but I have to agree with rubber's evaluation. Add to that its unusual creature type, and I'll give it a 2.5.
Posted By:
Leshrac_Nightwalker
(6/22/2010 12:37:42 PM)
only Nautilus in magic...what do you think the other creatures evolved from? plus that merchick is totally getting eatin..i gave it 5/5 for uniqueness and flavor..go ahead and yell at me
Posted By:
GoatKnapper
(5/8/2011 3:38:04 PM)
Remember that "whenever becomes blocked" does not mean it triggers for each blocker, but instead it triggers for the state change from "not blocked" to "blocked"; so don't bother with any Lure combos.
@GoatKnapper: *Sermon about how a card should not be rated by single characteristics such as artwork or flavor text, but by playability in certain formats instead*
Enough yelling? :P
Posted By:
Mode
(7/23/2011 12:46:52 PM)
This would be great with Lure, but only if you manage to get 2-3 cards out of it. It does not deter opponent from attacking, so it might be tricky to pull off.
Actually now that I think about it, a simple Bonesplitter would be the answer for this card. 4 damage is nasty to get hit with, and if he gets blocked you are most likely going to take something out with him, while drawing a card.
@Mode
I just checked with the ORC on MTGO, they confirmed that it does indeed work with Lure.
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(12/7/2012 8:28:09 PM)