x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 2.018 / 5  (57 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
12 >

I was raised on the belief that for vanilla dorks, the formula for a casting cost should never exceed that set forth by this formula:

Power + toughness divided by two.

Ergo, this should be 4cmc.
Posted By: HairlessThoctar (4/30/2011 7:59:26 PM)


When I saw the name, I thought of my ex-girlfriend's crotch.
Posted By: blindthrall (5/9/2011 11:10:47 PM)


I don't think I like these new Phyrexians as much as the old Phyrexians. The old ones were a lot cuter. E.g. Phyrexian Gremlins
Posted By: MarlinFlake (5/17/2011 2:58:29 PM)


No bigger insult to magic players than printing vanilla creatures (why shouldn't the creatures you use in draft have abilities? Vanilla is the worst concept ever, I hope it's a last resort cause of closing deadline thing).
Posted By: Sironos (6/2/2011 9:12:07 AM)


Won't see play in limited dinos since there are already so many much, much better dinos in the block. Hell, even red got one with their Beta Tyrannax.
Posted By: MrBarrelRoll (5/3/2011 6:55:39 AM)


It's just an expensive vanilla dork.
Posted By: Vinifera7 (5/28/2011 6:09:45 AM)


Redwood Treefolk
Those stats are still reasonable; only the rare Timber Protector is strictly better.
Posted By: HuntingDrake (6/7/2011 11:59:51 PM)


Maybe you should have had a plan? Vorinclex?
Posted By: Totema (1/15/2012 11:50:15 PM)


I wish every vanilla creature had this much flavor. Then vanilla creatures could be cool in their own way and less of a downer.
Posted By: FirstPrime (4/1/2013 7:30:53 PM)


Moss Monster was overpriced and useless all the way back in Legends, and creatures have generally gotten a lot cheaper since then. What on earth were they thinking?
Posted By: Aquillion (4/6/2013 4:55:31 PM)


Gatherer works better in the Companion app!