ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
I was raised on the belief that for vanilla dorks, the formula for a casting cost should never exceed that set forth by this formula:
Power + toughness divided by two.
Ergo, this should be 4cmc.
Posted By:
HairlessThoctar
(4/30/2011 7:59:26 PM)
When I saw the name, I thought of my ex-girlfriend's crotch.
Posted By:
blindthrall
(5/9/2011 11:10:47 PM)
I don't think I like these new Phyrexians as much as the old Phyrexians. The old ones were a lot cuter. E.g. Phyrexian Gremlins
Posted By:
MarlinFlake
(5/17/2011 2:58:29 PM)
No bigger insult to magic players than printing vanilla creatures (why shouldn't the creatures you use in draft have abilities? Vanilla is the worst concept ever, I hope it's a last resort cause of closing deadline thing).
Posted By:
Sironos
(6/2/2011 9:12:07 AM)
Won't see play in limited dinos since there are already so many much, much better dinos in the block. Hell, even red got one with their Beta Tyrannax.
Posted By:
MrBarrelRoll
(5/3/2011 6:55:39 AM)
It's just an expensive vanilla dork.
Posted By:
Vinifera7
(5/28/2011 6:09:45 AM)
Redwood Treefolk
Those stats are still reasonable; only the rare Timber Protector is strictly better.
Posted By:
HuntingDrake
(6/7/2011 11:59:51 PM)
Maybe you should have had a plan? Vorinclex?
Posted By:
Totema
(1/15/2012 11:50:15 PM)
I wish every vanilla creature had this much flavor. Then vanilla creatures could be cool in their own way and less of a downer.
Posted By:
FirstPrime
(4/1/2013 7:30:53 PM)
Moss Monster was overpriced and useless all the way back in Legends, and creatures have generally gotten a lot cheaper since then. What on earth were they thinking?
Posted By:
Aquillion
(4/6/2013 4:55:31 PM)