x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 2.188 / 5  (48 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
12 >
Could've at least been a more interesting tribe, if only to give it a slight edge in some decks. Pretty certain Beasts already have something similar.
Posted By: psychichobo (11/19/2012 2:56:25 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


1/5. A 4/3 body for cmc of 5. Its good in draft for its ETB ability to take out a pesky artifact but not much else. In competitive constructed its only a sideboard option if that.
Posted By: chrome_dome (1/13/2013 8:36:03 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@Jake1991: Pros don't like him in legacy, or in any other format.
Posted By: azure_drake222222 (2/3/2013 4:24:17 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Not a pro card, but it's not all bad. Obviously loses out to Stomphowler if you're running green. With artifact creatures on the board this can swing the advantage quite a bit. . .or might take out other artifacts of course. My battalion Boros take one along as they need as many bodies as they can get, even when performing utility.
Posted By: Stuflames (3/22/2013 11:19:03 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Love the flavour text, lol. Not a great card. Wish it had been artifact or enchantment.. so it could have destroyed the rarely used Tin Street Market for an awesome flavour match-up! Colour pie limitations not permitting this... Haste or Trample would have been good and fit the flavour!
Posted By: TowerDefender (6/8/2013 9:14:48 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Go away, Lotsofpoopy.
Posted By: mrchuckmorris (7/29/2013 11:24:27 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0