x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 0.991 / 5  (106 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
12 >
The question isn't why this card was created, but why it was reprinted.
Posted By: tavaritz (5/27/2011 8:57:34 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Worst. Card. Ever.

@holgir: Runesword at least has a decently priced effect. +2/+0 and disintegrate-type effects on a creature isn't good, but at least it does something! Ooh, I just prevented 1 damage, maybe 2, and now I have to return Rakalite to my hand at end of turn!

Is it even possible to give this card a 0/5?
Posted By: statiefreez (4/4/2010 7:57:06 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Hahaha, I forgot how terrible this card was. Shield of the ages does the EXACT same thing for 2 casting cost and does NOT return itself to your hand. Ugh. 0.5 / 5
Posted By: kowrip (5/17/2010 1:04:11 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@ holgir: Are you kidding? Runesword is Umezawa's Jitte compared to this!

Antiquities is one of my least favorite sets; this card proves it. Henceforth, when I comment on a card, I will keep Rakalite in mind, and think, "Well, it's better than Rakalite, at least."
Posted By: Weretarrasque (10/22/2009 6:51:08 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


8 mana
to stop
1 damage
That you have to pay for more than once
I'm in tears. Tears of absolute sadness that this exists. Why. WHY does this exist?
Posted By: Dolorosa (1/12/2012 10:28:12 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


"Which jerk voted more than 0.5 for this piece of junk?"
I just gave it 5 stars, HA HA
Posted By: DrJack (8/20/2012 11:04:23 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0