No. This is not a Ponder replacement. This is junk. Come on Wizards, you can do better than this.
Posted By:
True_Mumin
(7/28/2012 4:50:25 AM)
ITS BACK IN STANDARD YES!
Posted By:
atemu1234
(7/5/2012 4:24:56 PM)
ITS BACK IN STANDARD YES!
Report Abuse Posted By: atemu1234 (7/5/2012 4:24:56 PM)
---
Said no one ever.
Posted By:
Joseph_Leito
(7/6/2012 12:41:18 PM)
Will this see play in Standard? Possibly. But only if Delver continues to be a deck. Otherwise, the fact that you get card disadvantage, can't shuffle your deck, and could very well use this and still have five terrible draws ahead of you, is what makes this incomparable to Ponder.
Posted By:
Eternal_Blue
(7/6/2012 9:41:44 PM)
This card is good with Augur of Bolas. Ponder wouldn't work with Augur of Bolas. Play this, sort your topdeck for Augur of Bolas and cast AoB.
So in the end, you kinda get Ponder , and a 1/3 for 1UU. Con is no creatures or enchantments and -1 for card advantage.
Posted By:
WillyLovesRice
(8/1/2012 3:35:32 AM)
To be replaced in M14 with Urza's Glossary.
To be replaced in M15 with Urza's Table of Contents.
To be replaced in M16 with Urza's Thesaurus.
To be replaced in.....OK. I'm done.
Posted By:
DarthParallax
(7/5/2012 11:01:09 PM)
Will this see play to help with Delver? Maybe, but it still won't be that good. Still, with Evolving Wilds around this isn't that bad.
Posted By:
.Blaze.
(7/5/2012 5:49:01 PM)
Looking 5 cards ahead is very valuable for a pro like me who can also plan 5 turns ahead.
Posted By:
Lotsofpoopy
(9/3/2012 2:55:38 AM)
I'd play this...
Posted By:
Lord_of_Tresserhorn
(7/5/2012 7:18:36 PM)
Bye, bye Ponder!
Posted By:
SgtSwaggr
(7/6/2012 6:58:15 AM)