I want to make a deck with this and Quest for Ula's Temple.
Posted By:
ProsperoNight
(2/5/2014 2:41:25 PM)
I've seen someone play a Wrexial EDH deck using stuff like Quest for Ula's Temple. They'll be happy to see this card...
Posted By:
RapSnitchKnishes
(1/28/2014 5:50:14 PM)
Technically, it should say Octopodes...
Posted By:
Totema
(2/15/2014 3:25:31 PM)
@Syrtees - What do you mean, "otherwise?" I was agreeing with the fact that "Octopi" is incorrect.
Posted By:
Kaizeischi
(2/4/2014 1:08:16 AM)
Hoses Pack Rats, especially if you kill the original first.
Posted By:
sweetgab
(1/28/2014 11:26:41 PM)
Really cool but who on this planet has ever used the word "whelming" in a sentence ever?
Posted By:
lorendorky
(1/28/2014 7:21:33 PM)
Is no one going to make a "that was underwhelming" joke right now? ...Everyone's thinking it.
Posted By:
RAV0004
(1/28/2014 9:48:22 PM)
The Grammar-Nazi within me feels compelled to point out that the plural of Octopus is Octopi *eyetwitch*
Posted By:
GrayWizard
(1/30/2014 5:07:38 PM)
When I first read this card, I thought it was terribly narrow...
Until it was pointed out that in a deck with no creatures (or just manlands), this is a better Evacuation!
Also, Changelings.
Posted By:
Lord_of_Tresserhorn
(1/28/2014 5:40:01 PM)
It's funny that there's so much debate over this card's inclusion of Lorthos, the Tidemaker
He is the only card in the game with "Octopus" in his type line
Posted By:
El_Pared
(2/9/2014 12:35:18 AM)