Any reason you guys prefer Contagious Nim over Ichor Rats?
Posted By:
EpicBroccoli
(1/6/2011 7:00:43 PM)
at this price, get hand of the praetors instead. +1/+1 for it and each other infectious creature you control and a poison counter whenever you cast an infectious creature spell is worth more than haste.
Posted By:
catowner
(9/29/2010 4:17:15 PM)
I think this needs to be 2/2
Posted By:
skorpionrazor
(11/1/2011 11:13:41 PM)
No. It would be good for three mana. But four? It just sucks.
Posted By:
Beastlygreen
(10/9/2010 7:35:14 PM)
Should cost 3 at most, imo. Boggart Ram-Gang is better than this in almost every way possible, unless you realllly want infect.
Posted By:
Robface
(10/2/2010 10:21:18 AM)
The haste is somewhat negated by the extra mana cost, which means your opponent could have a 4/4 out by now. Avoid this card unless you plan on using it as a suicide attacker to get some counters on something.
Posted By:
franconbean
(2/8/2011 1:45:27 AM)
The cost is irrelevant, it could get battelfield at 3rd turn thanks to Warren Instigator.
Great Artwork, ty for the haste ;)
Posted By:
chremon
(9/24/2010 8:31:08 AM)
Aside from surprise factor, that goblins sucks big black *****. But don't underestimate surprise factor, it may prove fatal.
Posted By:
Gavrilo
(9/30/2010 1:19:14 AM)
Would a power of 3 have been too much to ask for?
Posted By:
Tiggurix
(11/3/2010 9:08:18 AM)
This card strikes me as weird. Considering Lost Leonin is a 2/1 with haste for 2 less in white, and infect is more a black/green mechanic.
Posted By:
bay_falconer
(6/4/2011 2:23:39 PM)