Duh. Use her to make That Which Was Taken indestructible. Then give her a Divinity Counter. Yeah.
Posted By:
Dr.Pingas
(7/11/2011 3:13:33 AM)
This is disgusting with Lightning Greaves.
Posted By:
kanguilla
(7/7/2011 4:04:09 PM)
So... Clone, anyone?
Posted By:
WateryMind
(7/7/2011 7:13:40 PM)
Avacyn, Angel of Hope is what we MAGIC fans like to describe as "strictly-- WAIT, WHAT THE?!?!!??!?"
This card is utterly obsolete. @.@
Posted By:
DarthParallax
(4/5/2012 1:19:23 PM)
See That Ice Cage.................................... Its Indestructible!
Posted By:
MasterOfEtherium
(7/7/2011 6:25:19 PM)
It's nice and balanced card. Not too powerful, and I wouldn't currently know any deck of mine I'd add it to, but it's still an ok card. 3/5
Posted By:
majinara
(7/8/2011 7:03:39 PM)
I only have one question about this angel, as it has a weird wording that I, at least, have never seen before;
Does her enters the battlefield effect uses the stack or not on activation?
The way its worded sounds like it doesn't, which would be exceptionally fine in cases when I have more than one good target. However, rulings on it don't mention that.
Posted By:
Half-dead
(1/5/2012 5:54:43 AM)
After playtesting with this I can say that this 6 mana is too much for what this card does. It would've been better if it say made all other angel creatures indestructible or gave a +1/+1 to all angels.
Posted By:
TARDIS79
(8/19/2011 4:29:04 PM)
Pretty cool that your opponent has to use two removal spells instead of one...unfortunately, both your guys are still dead and you didn't gain any card advantage. Obviously a bomb in any limited format, but white has access to so many killer 5 drops that there just isn't any real reason to play this.
Posted By:
Laguz
(7/11/2011 5:46:24 AM)
I really wish the angel could make itself indestructable. It's likely that it will be the biggest creature you have, and therefore the best candidate for protection.
Posted By:
voyager1
(7/13/2011 6:21:33 PM)