x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 1.193 / 5  (70 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
123 >
You know what?
If you were playing Sasaya or Azusa EDH, this would usually gain you 15+ life. However, you're most likely better off just playing more lands.

Regardless, singular, linear life gain is rarely good in Limited. If you get a creature that gains you life as well, that's pretty decent.
Posted By: Ferlord (1/6/2013 1:02:07 PM)


This turn five: 5 life

Thragtusk turn five: 5 life, 5/3 creature, and then eventually a 3/3 creature

Posted By: Purplerooster (1/12/2013 4:02:56 PM)


Thanks for releasing this in the same set as Thragtusk. Even easier to show a new player this card is not good.

"You say this card sucks? Why? If I have the 5 lands to play it, I gain 5 life!"

"Look at this: 5 life, a 5/3, and a 3/3, for the same cost AND you get the 5 life even if you have less than 5 lands, plus blink or bouncing effects or reanimation effects let you get insane value..."

"Wow, Bountiful Harvest sucks ass!"
Posted By: RedAtrocitus (5/20/2013 11:26:56 AM)


Strictly bad.
Posted By: Continue (6/1/2013 6:40:14 AM)


I got introduced to magic through a mono-green ramp deck from a friend. Yes it had this card. Immediately after reading it I told him this card is bad. I topdecked it a second time that game.
Posted By: HotHit (7/12/2013 5:48:18 PM)


TheWrathofShane wrathed down the relevant points pretty well about what's wrong with such cards.

They had an Arcane version of this that costs 1 less before this was printed, that alone unambiguously shows how pointlessly overcosted this is. There's just no excuse for printing blantantly terrible cards like this on purpose.
Posted By: Mode (12/13/2013 2:57:32 PM)