Animate Dead this thing, and steal away.
Posted By:
Bouchart
(10/1/2009 8:17:51 PM)
That skull is doing the troll face, LOL.
Anyway, if ante would still be part of the game this card would cost something similar to a mox, as it can be used to steal them.
Posted By:
BelloAbril
(11/2/2009 5:46:27 AM)
"Ante was fun you wusses.... Do you even realize that when you play for Ante, you can simply concede rather than lose a card?"
How is it that playing for ante makes you tough if you can simply concede? That eliminates absolutely all of the risk, and should show you how absurd your little chauvinist rant is.
Posted By:
scumbling1
(4/23/2011 7:16:01 PM)
It's in fact a strange thing to imagine that Ante was still not completely abandoned forever in Homelands.
The initial idea why something like Ante even existed - adding a gambling aspect to the game - wasn't that bad actually, but doing so by changing ownership was certainly a dead duck.
You can still gamble around these days in Magic - if want to have fun this way you'll just have to run red rather than black and start throwing coins - or use Gamble. (Obvious enough, isn't it?)
Posted By:
Mode
(10/17/2009 2:08:20 PM)
I AM curious about the flavor of these guys, though... The artwork is seriously creepy, and a mix of cool (the skeleton guy with his male genitalia nose) and totally herp derp (the, as someone put it, hitlerope...).
Posted By:
Lord_of_Tresserhorn
(3/5/2012 1:46:14 PM)
Type your comment here.
Posted By:
@go
(10/1/2009 11:32:31 AM)
Ante was fun you wusses. I like how someone put "Steal a Mox".... Yea, right, because when Ice Age came out ANYONE would let that happen.... Idiot... Do you even realize that when you play for Ante, you can simply concede rather than lose a card?
Posted By:
SlackWareWolf
(4/12/2010 12:56:09 PM)
@Qoios-Mauryn
You sir are my hero...
Seriously tho so glad someone finally said something that we've all been thinking
Posted By:
CranberryIce18
(4/23/2012 9:32:25 PM)
Wasn't this a scene from The Shining?
Posted By:
Saikuba
(5/15/2012 10:08:50 PM)
I can imagine fights breaking out over the use of this card, where an opponent will refuse to give their artifact away even though they are obliged to by the rules.
To put the imaginary note further, I can also imagine that, after the fight, while the opponent is alone and heading for home, they may be jumped and beaten unconscious by the player with a metal pipe, and left bleeding in the alley. Now, instead of simply claiming the artifact card that was rightfully earned according to the rules, the opponents entire deck is stolen instead. And all this violence over a card that forces a change in ownership of another card.
Posted By:
MechaKraken
(5/26/2012 7:21:22 PM)