I have two questions about this card.
1. What is legendary about it?
2. Why is it rare?
I suppose the answer to the second question might be so that it is harder to get--which would be a mercy.
Posted By:
Thingummy
(5/25/2012 1:29:13 PM)
anybody smell bull?
Posted By:
Shinigami-2099
(2/8/2011 8:45:06 PM)
@Thingummy
Its a Legend because is in the Legends set... thats about it.
Posted By:
phyrexiantrygon
(6/17/2012 9:52:19 AM)
But how come he's got an axe in his hand when the flavour text dictates that he took up a sword?!
Religion - 1
WotC - 0
Posted By:
Ferlord
(11/11/2012 3:20:28 PM)
What a let down creature. Waste of cool art and a cool name. At least wizards learned their lesson quickly after this.. Vanilla legendary = no!
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(12/9/2012 9:41:34 AM)
The reason guys like this are legendary, is because in their time 4 or 5 power WAS legendary. 4 stars because of the art, and kicking ass with him when he was new.
Posted By:
Psychrates
(1/22/2013 7:01:02 AM)
I seem to recall them making a LOT of really crappy gold creatures when they first started printing them.
Posted By:
johnnyninja
(2/11/2013 2:55:08 PM)
Slightly more useless than Emmara Tandris. Slightly.
Posted By:
lostmongoose
(6/15/2013 11:39:05 PM)
Wow, an exact rating of 1 after 100 votes. That's kind of amazing for the currently least rated legendary creature.
I can see why.
Posted By:
NARFNra
(6/25/2013 4:17:04 AM)
This is what happens when somebody in R&D thinks of backdraft EDH.
Posted By:
SirLibraryEater
(11/23/2013 11:50:43 AM)