x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 4.093 / 5  (118 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
12345 >
Honestly, I don't think I've ever REALLY played Nightmare, maybe because back then I was given a choice between him and Visara the Dreadful. Which is pretty damn obvious. :P But still, Nightmare seems really overcosted to me, plus he's just so easily dealt with (removal is pretty insane now, so many good spells). I'd much rather smash some faces with my Demigods than try and make this horsey worth my time. He's... just average. 3/5
Posted By: True_Mumin (8/9/2009 2:17:00 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Am I the only one who thinks the current artwork looks like a horse zombie and nothing like any nightmare I've ever seen before? The original artwork (this one came in for 7th edition) is the quintessential nightmare.
Posted By: Shadows_Vengeance (8/24/2009 9:18:24 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


One of my first rares. Pretty cool, but I've never really included her in a deck since the old days. *sigh* maybe someday when black gets mana acceleration back...
Posted By: madformedusa (9/26/2009 10:42:40 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Awesome card in the late game for mono-Black (or a multicolour with heavy emphasis on Black). Give him trample if your opponent has flyers inplay and it will be good times, forever. Or until the game ends, whichever comes first.
Posted By: SocialExperiment (7/28/2009 12:15:17 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Is it just me, or would anyone else like to see the old artwork updated with new frame?
Posted By: John-Bender (4/7/2010 2:14:52 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


ThunderhorsethunderhorsethunderhorseDETHKLOKDETHKLOK
Posted By: Shadoflaam (7/8/2012 1:43:13 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


nice budget card, but not too much of a gamebreaker in most games
Posted By: gnilleps (10/26/2009 11:53:12 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


used to have a 3rd maybe 4th edition of this. got it as a gift one year. just wish i knew what the hell happened to it. personally i think that the cc should include double black. for a creature so focused on swamps it only has one black in its casting cost?
Posted By: LeMaK (12/4/2009 2:15:40 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


this card is my prized possession i play when i have the chance but that isnt often that i can...i agree with shadows_vengeance it doesnt really look like anything nightmare lol
Posted By: KIBA20096 (1/30/2010 10:54:56 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Fun, fun card, but it's so uncompetitive these days that I can't even find a spot for it in any of my casual decks. Might work in a deck with Primeval Titan and Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth, but even then, you could probably scare up a better beater for the mana.

Still would make me smile if I saw it in a reprint though.
Posted By: Paleopaladin (9/1/2011 11:07:13 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0