Boy, you all beat around the bush with Shane, huh? Here, let me help...
Shane. We are sick of your childish whining and religious extremism about our beloved Devils and Demons.
Go away and leave us to our joyous angel slaughter and sacrificial human flaying.
We'll be fine without you. Thanx for comin out...
Posted By:
MICKEY.KNOX
(6/5/2013 8:25:41 AM)
@Infernox
You don't get a chance to cast spells in between the time your opponent makes a decision and the creature is sacrificed. So you'd have to play Undying Evil first, and at that point, you're 2-for-1 and yadda yadda yadda.
Anyway, this guy is an interesting guy, seems fair though.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(4/27/2012 1:24:52 AM)
@drpvfx: Gotta agree on that. A lot of people hate on "opponent chooses" cards, but if both choices are sufficiently brutal then there really isn't much of a choice!
Another complaint that people might have is, "they can just let you have the creature after they've got a titan on the board." If your opponent's stabilized a big enough creature board, mono-red has probably already lost the game. You have to make 20 damage happen faster than that, if you're playing a deck with this guy in it.
That being said, compare with Reckless Abandon and Furnace Scamp and scratch your head a lot.
Posted By:
steev
(4/26/2012 5:59:16 PM)
Goin' STRAIGHT into my Riku of Two Reflections EDH deck. or...maybe just my kiki-jiki legacy deck... :3
Posted By:
lightningrod14
(4/29/2012 9:33:50 AM)
This card merely reinforces my belief in how awesome Typhoid Rats are.
Posted By:
Enemy_Tricolor
(5/7/2012 12:31:24 AM)
Proclamation of Rebirth.
Posted By:
BongRipper420
(11/11/2012 2:31:09 AM)
In Legacy, you could use Stifle. 2 mana, 2 cards, for a 4/3. Not bad, not bad....although a lot of folks would argue Tarmogoyf would be the better 2 mana beatstick here, and not require 2 cards. But still! Neat li'l concept at least.
Posted By:
friendtoall17
(4/29/2012 7:10:59 AM)
Vastly overrated by average players and vastly underrated by 'pros'. This card is actually quite fair. Yes, it's four damage for one, and yes, it's a 4/3 for one, and either of these are amazing in a vacuum...but not when your opponent gets to choose which is which. RDW rarely wants to burn to the dome right off the bat and i can guarantee you this will always be 4 damage when you drop it first turn or your opponent is...well, you know.
Still, the power is huge and undeniable, regardless of what those questionable article writers on some sites seem to think.
Posted By:
Laguz
(4/29/2012 3:19:15 PM)
@TheWrathofShane
I think the question is, did you really just go there? If it is so offensive to you, don't play it. Simple as that. The reason they used that type in particular had a lot to do with the issues that were being performed in the storyline for the Innistrad block. There is nothing here that should make it offensive, and you shouldn't exaggerate it as such too...
Posted By:
Jedijoe
(9/16/2012 12:03:33 PM)
@TheWrathofShane
Either you are trolling, or you know know so little about the book that you take so seriously to get offended by a piece of cardboard in a game.
If it was that serious to you, you should of quit a long time ago. Djinn/Efreet are synomous with devils in the "good book", and they've been staple magic creatures since the beginning. Not to mention all of the other types of demons/avitars and the like.
I would come to the conclusion because of that that you are indeed trolling but after dealing with your type for so long I never underestimate the power of blind, ignorant belief.
Posted By:
Kagatob
(10/10/2012 2:48:34 AM)