Not entirely better. Gravedigger has one more power and toughness, is more splashable at 1 black mana requirement, and has a very relevant creature type.
Posted By:
Nagoragama
(9/10/2011 9:06:03 PM)
Am I the only one who realized that the Imp is actually doing something "nice"? Just read the flavor text and look at the picture.
Posted By:
surewhynot
(10/28/2010 8:27:39 PM)
a bit costly but good.
Posted By:
scutemob
(5/2/2010 11:41:15 AM)
I wouldn't say he's better than gravedigger at all - not by a long shot. Consider double power and toughness, faaaar better creature type, less restrictive mana cost.
That said - another piece of the puzzle in an imp tribal.
Posted By:
Baconradar
(8/13/2010 3:04:39 AM)
I like Gravedigger more, because he's a zombie.
Last time I checked, there wasn't a thriving Imp tribe.
Posted By:
NoobOfLore
(11/6/2011 7:00:56 PM)
A playable Gravedigger !
Posted By:
True_Smog
(4/28/2010 7:46:57 AM)
I kinda still like Masouleum Turnkey better, but then again you kinda have to set up your deck in a way that doesn't allow the opponent to choose crappy creatures. Something about imps just rubs me the wrong way.
Posted By:
achilleselbow
(7/9/2010 8:48:51 PM)
Chimney Imp walls this guy all day.
Posted By:
gman92
(3/3/2012 8:26:11 AM)
@ Grimjawx, and the mostly horrible or meh nature of the other imp cards banishes that thought
Posted By:
Corey_bayoudragonfly
(2/2/2011 5:05:24 PM)
Not better than Gravedigger. But not worse: I'd say they are about even. The imp is cheaper, but has a more restrictive mana cost. Gravedigger has a bigger body, but lacks evasion. Of course, Gravedigger is also a zombie, so I guess it is more relevant than the imp. Oh well, guess I'll just wait for Wizards to print an imp lord.
Posted By:
ParishInquisitor
(3/12/2013 1:44:44 PM)