You can boo and nay-say all you want but this is still my favorite common equip in the set. It's cheap and has a relevant ability and because it is so under valued it makes it real easy to get in a draft, if only to power up your white guys that like to be equipped.
Posted By:
Tommy9898
(9/27/2010 3:34:46 PM)
It's not Lightning Greaves or Thousand-Year Elixir, but it will do :)
Posted By:
gelleetin
(9/23/2010 10:12:21 PM)
Kinda like Obsidian Battle-Axe.
Posted By:
superstalker75
(9/24/2010 7:39:53 AM)
Could work well with infect in limited, or at least make your opponent think twice before swinging with all of their creatures.
Posted By:
Stray_Dog
(10/1/2010 7:00:16 AM)
I have to agree with Pwnsaw. I think Wizards has done better with limiting the number of broken cards in sets. This card has a low equip cost, so I don't understand why people are complaining about it. Plus, there are ways to get the card on the battlefield without paying its casting cost. Overall, it's a small price to pay to have bigger creatures attack in the same turn they enter the battlefield.
Posted By:
youbeenswerved
(6/6/2011 9:14:35 AM)
i played this with a starter infect deck (scars of mirrodin) and was nice in some cases 3.5/5
Posted By:
skorpionrazor
(6/17/2011 6:46:45 AM)
Seconded! It's good card for limited. It makes everything that it touches better, counts for metalcraft and isn't too expensive. Equipment and auras never were good in removal soaked format which standard is.
Posted By:
Gavrilo
(9/28/2010 5:47:05 AM)
This is lightning greaves minus the the broken. Its good enough for its purpose;t equips cheap enough to make giving haste relevant.
Posted By:
Pwnsaw
(10/14/2010 9:44:07 PM)
Why is it equipped to Blaziken?
Posted By:
BluthBanana
(7/4/2011 12:39:33 PM)
Obviously way worse than Greaves, but I think it would be decent in a Titan-based deck if Equip was 0. You would get 2 of the creature's abilities the turn they come in. That 1 mana Equip cost really is a strong deterrent.
Posted By:
coyotemoon722
(12/28/2010 2:09:27 PM)