I am way more happy than I should be that this was reprinted. Also very good finisher in drafts.
Posted By:
swords_to_exile
(4/28/2012 9:24:35 PM)
@Ninjagod5092 Considering that this is a reprint of an oldschool card with iconic name, there wasn't much Wizards could do about her mediocrity besides the good move of downgrading her to an uncommon.
Suits the Set very nicely, and does an okay job for limited at least.
I just feel like the art could have been used for another angel instead. Don' get me wrong it's nice and all, but it doesn't look particularly archangelic to me (imho the Starter's artwork for example comes more with an (arch)angel's grace :P)
Posted By:
Mode
(4/29/2012 5:37:47 AM)
Great reprint for drafts.
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(5/3/2012 3:37:50 PM)
Great art, solid Limited card. Not so much in Constructed the way the game has evolved over the years. Still, I'm sort of glad they brought this back.
Posted By:
SyntheticDreamer
(4/27/2012 8:57:06 PM)
I'm so glad this got downgraded to uncommon. Upgraded? bah. I'm glad.
Posted By:
ZEvilMustache
(4/28/2012 5:46:33 PM)
Since they can't put Serra Angel in Avacyn Restored, this is cool. I always love to see oldchool reprints, and this one fits the set perfectly! *** & ½
Posted By:
lukedgh
(4/26/2012 3:46:25 PM)
Well, a nostalgia card, for people still having their vision archangels around. Below the curve for most modern creatures. Still, a 5/5 uncommon flyer is something to be reckoned with in limited.
Posted By:
majinara
(4/26/2012 11:46:58 PM)
Old school with amazing art. I feel the art could have been put to better use but alas.
Posted By:
Harmonrova
(4/26/2012 4:06:05 PM)
Wow, wasn't anticipating this particular reprint!
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(5/2/2012 8:34:10 AM)
Not suited for competitive constructed play, but it could be a good in limited. Plus it has nice art.
Posted By:
Powercat
(4/27/2012 8:08:46 PM)