Beautiful.
Posted By:
Goatllama
(6/20/2011 10:34:36 AM)
Well,it's an angel.
Posted By:
ClockworkSwordfish
(6/17/2011 10:23:17 AM)
Why so serious?
Posted By:
Cyberium
(6/17/2011 12:27:40 PM)
Should be an Angel Scarecrow, given the art.
Posted By:
Salient
(8/29/2011 10:25:10 PM)
Its a fair card with the chosen color type ability. She's not amazing but you get what your paying for. On the other hand if this is to be reprinted, I strongly suggest Wizards develop a better art for this card.
Posted By:
astreck
(7/26/2012 1:44:56 PM)
Good card choice in enchantment decks, beef her up with your choice and swing away, but wotc, please update this scary ***
Posted By:
Layk
(11/15/2012 12:33:48 PM)
Could be better, but its ok for chump blocking agenst a mono-color deck.
3/5 stars
Posted By:
Hunter06
(11/18/2012 3:55:24 PM)
I am impressed by this Angel's commitment to wearing pants. That's pretty rare these days.
She's great, I find. Whatever you're against she'll be there to block.
Posted By:
psychichobo
(6/25/2013 3:04:42 PM)
rk post is a great artist, I feel the art is under appreciated.
As for the card, it's always been solid and flexible for it's mana cost. Nowadays I'm sure this would have been printed with a 3/3 or a 3/4 body because of the power creep but the card is still nice.
Posted By:
Harmonrova
(8/4/2013 7:00:34 AM)