Not strictly better than Zap; this doesn't combo with things like Pyromancer Ascension, Chandra, the Firebrand, Reverberate or Kiln Fiend.
Posted By:
BegleOne
(8/17/2011 7:13:59 AM)
Not as bad as said here. Uncounterable Zap, or efficient creature? Sounds good.
Posted By:
Designer_Genes
(10/16/2009 9:27:20 PM)
@Cenelder:
Is that why half of the ranking tournament decks are Jund?
Posted By:
VirtueVsVice
(10/20/2009 1:49:31 PM)
Zap was playable in limited in certain situations, so you don't need to actually be able to play this clunky card. Uncounterable damage is nice, too.
Posted By:
ZEvilMustache
(4/26/2009 7:58:52 AM)
I'm giving this an honourable mention for being the only one of the Sojourners that isn't absolutely awful!
Posted By:
Asinine-Ultimatum
(5/22/2009 5:15:00 PM)
Jund really didn't get the love that grixis got, did it... =(
Posted By:
Cenelder
(4/30/2009 8:48:55 PM)
wow.. this is only slightly better than a flare...
Posted By:
spoonish
(5/10/2009 8:42:56 AM)
this is baaad crapy art,nothing of jund at all and it`s just ....well crap
Posted By:
Iiory
(7/27/2009 2:06:38 AM)
Strictly better than Zap. Prove me wrong?
Posted By:
DacenOctavio
(2/3/2011 11:36:27 PM)
Not bad. A CMC of BRG for a 3/2 in case you need some creature to beat out, this isn't hard for a Jund deck provided you have the right lands. The cycling ability, believe me when I said this, that one card draw and that one damage determines your success or failures in a match.
Posted By:
SorianSadaskan
(5/6/2010 10:23:25 PM)