"Engulfing gulp"? Do people get paid for this?
Posted By:
Kirbster
(3/6/2012 3:11:25 PM)
Actually one of my favorite vanilla commons. The game needs creatures like this after all.
Posted By:
Vandarringa
(7/21/2011 9:31:52 PM)
What is everyone so bummed about? Less expensive than a Craw Wurm, and it has -1/+2 over it, which isn't that bad. 4 stars,and I'm probably the first one to give it that.
Posted By:
Dragonmaster3.0
(9/20/2011 9:10:25 AM)
Vandarringa is right. Wizards prints cards like this intentionally, because the game needs simple cards sometimes. Have you ever opened a pack in a draft and been presented with 15 solid blocks of text? It's overwhelming. New players need things like this.
Posted By:
ScissorsLizard
(2/1/2012 6:32:35 PM)
I've always loved the art on this.
Posted By:
SirMalkin
(7/23/2011 12:20:36 AM)
Dies of boredom.
Posted By:
lorendorky
(7/8/2011 2:50:28 AM)
Not cool, Wizards.
Posted By:
blindthrall
(7/11/2011 2:46:44 PM)
At least it's not Craw Wurm...
Posted By:
bkarcher42
(7/18/2011 11:12:06 AM)
Let's propose neat abilities for the vanilla creatures that get printed in each new core set. Who knows, a bored Wizards developer may happen upon one...
---
When Vastwood Gorger attacks, you may exile a land you control consumed by Vastwood Gorger.
At the beginning of your upkeep, Vastwood Gorger gets +1/-1 for each land consumed by it.
Posted By:
Salient
(8/29/2011 10:03:39 PM)
Other flavor text is better, in my opinion.
Posted By:
NeoKoda
(11/1/2011 3:46:29 PM)