ok, so i agree it sucks, but why is it rated the lowest in the game, there are plenty of worse cards. Its almost worth rateing it up to put those cards in there rightfull place.
Posted By:
bijart_dauth
(12/23/2010 12:36:46 PM)
It's a shame a card with such flavor (I get a real prehistoric vibe from this guy) has to be so bad... Why must it be so!?
Posted By:
Blackworm_Bloodworm
(12/24/2010 10:57:36 PM)
Lowest rated card on The Gatherer! And deservingly, too...besides for maybe Untaidake, the Cloud Keeper...at least it can chump block, or fuel a sacrifice...poorly
Posted By:
Superllama12
(1/28/2011 6:41:54 PM)
They printed this just to distract everybody from Chimney Imp. Why does Wizards hate regeneration so much?
@Rafiq: Good one.
Posted By:
blindthrall
(3/16/2011 1:05:38 PM)
Has no redeeming qualities whatsoever
0.5/5
Posted By:
luca_barelli
(5/11/2011 8:36:15 PM)
Simply Atrocious.
Posted By:
JFM2796
(7/27/2011 10:10:08 PM)
I honestly think that wizards wants to make a cycle of Storm Crow like cards. I mean this one feels kinda on par with him. There are cards that suck as bad, or worse (maybe) but the 2/1, bad cost, and horrible, but jokingly related ability (it allows him to smash face more) feel very Storm Crow. I wonder what Green and White will get, maybe a colorless one too?
Posted By:
ICEFANG13
(8/11/2011 12:00:08 AM)
So bad it's funny.
Posted By:
badmalloc
(9/26/2011 9:48:23 PM)
I am sad that they wasted this artwork on such a useless card.
Posted By:
ScurbyPirate
(4/26/2012 4:59:28 PM)
This might be a decent card if it also had Devour 3, or even 2, or jeeze even 1... but no, this card is going straight to my rip list. This is defenatly one of the worst cards in Magic :P
Posted By:
thopterthallid
(6/29/2009 12:59:32 PM)