There are no comments yet for this card.
@PhyrexianLobbiest Serra is probably reference to the rank of the angel, most likely a corruption of Seraphim, angels of the highest rank, and not a specific angel. Sorry.
Posted By:
BlameBot
(7/23/2010 3:42:12 PM)
I imagine a serra angel planeswalker and I am loving it! :)
Posted By:
iSlapTrees
(10/31/2010 8:25:25 PM)
@ Diachronos no, she really dosent compaire to baneslayer. You could give baneslayer vigalance more eaisly then giving serra FS//LL first off. Its about card tempo. Baneslayer has all those abilitys in one package. If they dont have an answer to her, she can gain 5 health and do 5 damage each turn. With that life gain you can attack her with no fear, and if you need to be defencive you still get the 5 life and take out a creature. First strike makes it very hard for someone to match her in the skys. shes also invulerable to most deathtouchers that can reach her. Can completly turn the game in any situation. They cost the same but baneslayer just dominates, and serra is just a presence.
1 body differnence is a big deal as 4 and 5 are magic numbers in MTG. with 4 dmg, it takes 5 turns to kill someone and with 5 it takes 4.
This was a staple tho back in the day. There was no "power creep" and 4/4 flying vigilance for 5 was extremely efficent back then. I understand why they ma... (see all)
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(12/30/2010 2:16:18 AM)
This used to be an amazing card. You were excited about playing it. Now I wouldn't even include it in an angels tribal deck, since Wizards decided that they could make cards as powerful as they wanted as long as they made them Mythic rare.
This isn't why I stopped buying magic cards, but it's one of the reasons I'm not starting to again.
Posted By:
Wulfsten
(6/1/2011 1:56:40 PM)