Not bad for its time and mana filters can often see some play.
Posted By:
Radagast
(11/4/2011 8:10:02 PM)
@ pumaman83
One of her eyes appears slightly higher than the other because her head is tilted. If you find her only "vaguely attractive" than you need testosterone injections.
Posted By:
DrJack
(8/22/2012 12:52:23 PM)
She's in love with herself...
She likes the dark...
And on her milk white neck...
The devils mark.
Posted By:
TravisBlanchard
(1/12/2013 3:39:04 PM)
@TheWrathofShane
I disagree.
Posted By:
emlit
(3/27/2013 8:48:56 PM)
She's a cutie. She's also very playable. 4/5
Posted By:
Continue
(1/10/2013 4:01:27 PM)
The Magic Web site did an "Ask Wizards" feature where they revealed the actual woman who inspired the artwork for this card. Check it out: http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/arcana/1736
Posted By:
iandustrial
(4/19/2009 3:05:21 PM)
Elves of Deep Beauty.
Also, Modern-legal! :D
Posted By:
Lord_of_Tresserhorn
(4/16/2013 2:27:31 AM)
Though possibly a little out-dated, I still find her mana ability excellent and I ran her during Ravnica thanks to the reprint. She's not Urborg Elf, but her cost makes her a nice turn 1 or 2 (in my case with a Soul Warden).
I also love the art. She's cute. I'm part Vorthos. Art matters.
Posted By:
Tilon13
(11/19/2008 12:49:49 AM)
Everyone loves this card for the art. As do I. Pity the new one is so meh worthy. Great for a deck that uses this mana and likes elves I suppose. Surprised it wasn't tossed into Lorwyn too. Funny how the Golgari got 2 cards from "The Dark".
Posted By:
kitsunewarlock
(2/26/2010 4:50:12 PM)
i suppose most people like The Dark's "goth girl" art more than the Ravnica one^^
Posted By:
Mode
(1/25/2009 3:27:41 AM)