x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 3.029 / 5  (35 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
 >
An excellent EDH inclusion. I approve.
Posted By: KikiJikiTiki (6/16/2011 6:48:24 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Terrible card. Horribly over-costed for its effect, Even with Ghave, Guru of Spores.

Eight mana to get rid of one single (hope it doesn't have shroud/hexproof), non-black, creature. Best case scenario you might get 5 or 6 tokens blowing up an enemy commander.
99 times out of 100 the eight mana you could produce on this card would be better spent winning you the game.

1.5/5

EDIT: Saying power or toughness instead of converted mana cost would have easily made this card ten times better and an auto-include in many saproling decks.
Posted By: Tonymitsu (7/9/2011 10:31:55 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Really good with Ghave. No creature for them, Ghave gets huge. Or just leave the army of tokens.
Posted By: ClockworkSwordfish (6/24/2011 10:09:10 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I hate that this costs 8 MANA! but once you get to play it I suppose it's good. but this could have easily been six mana.
Posted By: Arachibutyrophobia (7/13/2011 6:36:58 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


It's weird.
The mana cost is excessive, but since it'll be later game, you'll be getting more sapros anyway.
I like this card a lot, though. Very nice inclusion.
Posted By: infernox10 (8/10/2011 1:39:32 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


It's an 8 CMC, dual color sorcery, and it still has a "non-black" clause.
My, how times have changed.
Wouldn't "non-artifact" have made more sense flavor-wise?
Posted By: TDL (11/5/2011 11:46:09 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Wouldn't have minded if it weren't for that annoying nonblack clause.

Still, it's old. That's an excuse, or something. And nuking a big thing's no bad thing.
Posted By: psychichobo (11/14/2012 4:30:53 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@Tonymitsu
What.. the... ****....
How would this be an auto-include if it were based off power or toughness? Most of the time, creatures have less, or equal power and/or toughness compared to their mana cost.

This card is bad because it costs a crapton of mana, and isn't even that good. For the same amount of mana, you could have casted decree of pain instead. That cards would net you WAY more advantage, and would be useful in WAY more situations. If you're using ghave, you may as well have casted martial coup instead. Get lots of tokens anyway, and kill everything.
Posted By: SAUS3 (6/18/2013 12:16:47 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


The concept was great and I like that you get saprolings but I really don't like the nonblack clause. Putrify, Maelsrom Pulse, solid cards that have little restrictions in the same colors. Death Mutation could easily have read "Destroy target creature ..." and it would have been okay. Oh well.
Posted By: Beisman01 (2/17/2014 9:13:31 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 




We have updated our privacy policy. Click the link to learn more.

Gatherer works better in the Companion app!

Continue