Um, just saying, if you were using him with Pandemonium, he'd be just full of win.
Posted By:
infernox10
(3/10/2011 11:34:27 PM)
Hell's Thunder: 4/4 flying haste for 3 CMC, can't block, only swings once (no one uses unearth on it, too expensive)
This: 4/2 haste for 3 CMC, dodges board wipes, can't block, swings repeatedly.
All in all, I'd rather have this.
Posted By:
PolskiSuzeren
(5/18/2010 2:35:58 AM)
Yeaaaah... This guy is way better than Hell's Thunder. You drop him and swing when your opponent has only mana dorks out, like Llanawar Elves or Birds of Paradise and make them choose whether to negate the damage by losing a card they want or taking 4 to the face. Think of it as a Lightning Blast, but it's 1 cheaper and has not only the ability but a likelihood to recur several times over. If Hell's Thunder could use unearth over and over every time you sac'd it, it would be better, but it's only a two shot. Not as good at all.
Posted By:
OpenSeasonNoobs
(11/23/2010 5:39:10 PM)
LOL Everyone Unearths Hells Thunder You Dolt. I Can't Beleive Your Comparing First Of All And Can't Even Fathom You Think He's Better NO WAY No Offense Sandstalker
Posted By:
MasterOfEtherium
(7/13/2010 6:07:53 PM)
Better than Hells Thunder? No! Good card? Sure! Heck, just use them in the same deck!
Posted By:
Anubisisking
(8/20/2011 1:40:49 PM)
I always gonna put the star thinking about the old days cards...and believe me this card *** rock!
4.0
Posted By:
Kikke
(9/6/2011 10:34:32 PM)
If this guy gets chump blocked, either you want him to be chump blocked, you're not putting this guy in the right decks, or you're just not playing the deck in the proper way. With Red, chump blocking on these guys shouldn't be a problem.
Creature burn exists for a reason. This recurs. Lightning Bolt and company do not recur. Figure out how to combine the two.
4 or 4.5.
Posted By:
humor_love
(3/16/2012 8:49:41 AM)