IT EXISTS! They said I was crazy! But the yeti really exists!
-SavageBrain, Yeti food
Posted By:
SavageBrain89
(7/3/2009 1:03:47 PM)
The "if it's in play" clause is there because if your opponent wants to save his Dark Confidant, he can just Doomblade the yeti and the damage won't be dealt, unlike the effects of Pandemonium.
If they wanted to make this guy good, they would have to take of the sorcery condition on the second ability. That and make it not cost snow.....
Posted By:
Ritius
(12/29/2009 6:57:50 AM)
Don't mess with sasquatch.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(10/20/2010 11:18:04 PM)
Well. It kills creatures with Snowballs of Doom.
Posted By:
Bursama
(11/20/2010 3:49:29 AM)
Arts Much Better Than The Card Wish It Was Playable. But It Kills Biirds And Elves So Not Bad At All In Limited.
Posted By:
MasterOfEtherium
(1/1/2011 6:58:56 PM)
Not as good as FTK, but still decent. Got some of these in a red-blue snow deck of mine. Turn two coldsteel heart, turn 3 this yeti, eating up a small creature of theirs.
The bounce ability is at times of use as well. It makes him basically immune to auras like pacifism, and you can also play it prior to mass removal. Not to mention it makes opponents think twice about playing small creatures while this guy is in play.
In another deck, I also had a way of giving him persist. So he came into play, his ability triggered, I gave him persist. He dealt 3 damage to a large creature, he was killed by the creature, persisted back into play, dealt another 2 damage to that creature and got killed again.
Also good, if you have cards in play that continuously pump him, such as glorious anthem, or pump him in response to his ability, like with thriss, nantuko primus, since the yeti can then kill much larger stuff.
Also fun if you have only these yetis ... (see all)
Posted By:
majinara
(4/24/2011 4:32:32 AM)
Good, but pales in comparison to the extreme power of Flametongue Kavu.
Posted By:
kiseki
(8/12/2011 2:50:09 PM)
Fantastic in Yeti tribal.
Posted By:
Totema
(3/16/2012 4:34:11 PM)
Does anyone know why this hasn't been retemplated to "fight" yet? Cards as far back as Triangle of War have been.
It does have a slightly different template than the usual ("it deals damage and that creature deals damage" instead of "deal damage to each other") but there's actually no difference between those templates, right?
Or does the other creature not get to damage the yeti if it dies from the yeti's damage?
Posted By:
noobraz
(5/10/2012 2:26:46 AM)