A this with G or 1G Regen would be excellent.
Posted By:
n00bmag1
(6/28/2010 7:09:04 AM)
Wall of Wood...my friends and I affectionately refer to it as the "*** Block."
Posted By:
CJM2
(11/5/2010 11:07:38 AM)
Strictly worse than Wall of Vines, and I didn't think much of Vines anyway... I always prefer waiting another turn to play a much better Wall of Tanglecord.
Posted By:
redsoxftw
(6/14/2011 6:47:24 PM)
Why is this just a "Wall" creature type, when Wall of Brambles is a Plant Wall?
Posted By:
ArashikageClan
(7/14/2009 9:45:33 PM)
Agreed, plus this is one of the worst walls in play.
(Colorless) artifacts should normally not be able to get a better P/T ratio than colored cards, yet Steel Wall being a 0/4 one-drop especially shows how weak this creature actually is.
There are other 0/3 creatures at this cost with further abilities, you should not consider playing this one. Tinder Wall, Llanowar Augur and Treefolk Harbinger do a better job, the latter ones not even being walls.
Posted By:
Mode
(8/16/2009 2:59:01 AM)
Phyrexian Walker is nearly the same thing but much better. No Defender, so it can attack if it's been pumped. It also costs less.
Posted By:
lukemol
(2/18/2010 6:18:29 PM)
Strictly worse than Treefolk Harbinger, and soon Wall of Vines.
Also; epic flavor fail for not being a "Creature - Plant Wall".
Posted By:
HairlessThoctar
(6/15/2010 9:31:29 AM)
Wall of Wood had no business being reprinted in 10th edition.
Posted By:
reapersaurus
(4/4/2010 11:16:56 AM)
You know what? Its okay in a deck full of fat green. It holds off the riff-raff for a couple turns untill you drop a Terra Stomper.
Posted By:
iondragonx
(10/26/2009 9:01:59 PM)
Earnest art director: "This time, you have to paint the Wall of Wood!" I pity Rebecca Guay. ;-)
I wonder if some artists care when they are commissioned to contribute to obviously weak cards, probably not.
Posted By:
holgir
(9/25/2009 3:48:29 AM)