x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 3.745 / 5  (55 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
12 >
This card should NOT be a common for how good it is. 1W in commons usually just buys a vanilla 2/1.
Posted By: Joseph_Leito (6/26/2009 8:38:52 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


A 2-power first striker for 2 is always good. Always.
Posted By: Paolino (1/12/2012 2:41:09 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


It is so completely, utterly, unquestioningly worse than White Knight (because even though White Knight is more color committing, it's easy enough to play in any deck that uses White, and is usually worth it.)

But it still deserves 3 stars. Knights just kind of kick ass.
Posted By: DarthParallax (8/7/2011 8:23:45 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Rebecca Guay artwork bumps this up to a 4.5 :)
Posted By: brockdjwest (12/21/2012 2:26:20 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


didn't you used to be green...
Posted By: ApathyVoc (1/11/2013 5:07:19 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


"It is so completely, utterly, unquestioningly worse than White Knight (because even though White Knight is more color committing, it's easy enough to play in any deck that uses White, and is usually worth it.)"

If you have to qualify a point like mana cost, you're wrong. If you are running anything but mono-white, White Knight is not strictly superior because you are more likely to be mana-screwed and unable to play him.
Posted By: 00zau (1/11/2013 9:36:22 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 




We have updated our privacy policy. Click the link to learn more.

Gatherer works better in the Companion app!

Continue