x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 2.714 / 5  (35 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
 >
Slightly better then Kingfisher due to creature types.
Posted By: Eved (7/20/2010 6:19:25 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


fish=cards.
Posted By: Kryptnyt (8/11/2010 6:32:16 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I'd rather cast a Mulldrifter.
Posted By: Chamale (1/30/2011 10:56:27 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This would be Phyrexian if it were in Scars of Mirrodin.
Posted By: JWolps (12/1/2010 1:38:06 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Darkslick Drake. Unless your going for creature type.
Posted By: JWalks82 (1/7/2011 6:38:59 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Guys, I'm aware that this card is not very good and that it won't ever be used competatively, but it's not that bad. There's nothing wrong with a flier that replaces itself. Magic is about card advantage, and this guy gives you that. End of story.
Posted By: marmaris74 (4/9/2012 4:12:58 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


2/2 For 4? Not the best.
Posted By: jhimbob (3/28/2009 6:27:20 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Most Avens are despised for good reason, in the same way a lot of Vishano cards are mediocre or bad.

An okay card but I'll settle for Oculus or some other cheap flying or draw.
Posted By: Deepfried-Owls (5/13/2011 5:29:09 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Runewing is the same, except for creature type.
Posted By: azure_drake222222 (2/5/2013 8:15:37 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0