I used these guys for, oh, I don't know, forever. They were fairly solid defenders and could attack and cover my butt at the same time. They were also nice with Vulshok Gauntlets.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(12/19/2010 11:50:45 AM)
dunno what they ditched this art, this is much better than 8th.
Posted By:
Richard_Hawk
(12/26/2010 10:45:36 PM)
Looks like a reprint of Yotian Soldier. Yotian saw a ton of play back in the days of revised; he was a solid defender who could take a "free hack" without tapping.
This is arguably an upgrade since it carries the "soldier" type in a white deck.
3/5
Posted By:
Gaussgoat
(4/13/2010 12:32:09 PM)
(Almost) strictly worse than Priests of Norn.
Posted By:
Robface
(2/25/2011 8:30:24 AM)
@Gaussgoat:
Check the Oracle wording on Yotan Soldier - it has the "Soldier" type.
Posted By:
A3Kitsune
(2/20/2011 10:38:04 PM)
They should sit down and let the damn mouse pass through.
Posted By:
Goatllama
(9/7/2012 10:09:37 AM)
@Robface
Not even close, infect can be a drawback. If you got most of your deck dealing damage, and only a few things with infect, its not even worth attacking with most of the time. If he had "wither" instead of infect, and was a human soldier, you could start throwing around strictly better in this case.
But even then, wither could reset someones Young Wolf, so its not better in all cases.
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(12/12/2012 8:20:03 PM)
The soldier in the right is Antonio Banderas
Posted By:
felpa-kun
(1/7/2013 9:25:22 PM)
I've found this card to be useful for the addition of it's Human subtype that Yotian Soldier lacks. Both are good cards.
Posted By:
Luchian-D
(5/27/2014 12:48:22 PM)