cool concept but costs too much 3cc and 3 to tap would be more reasonable.
Posted By:
GrimGorgonBC
(10/30/2009 2:39:29 PM)
agree with GrimGorgonBC, it costs too much, I think it could of cost 2 to activate...
also, this looks like a nice tattoo to get...
Posted By:
Guest57443454
(11/29/2009 7:13:41 PM)
Artifacts in the early sets were always overcosted to compensate for their ability to fit into any colored deck. Remember that color hate was much more powerful then, and artifacts let you get around a lot of it. Most of the time, {2} on an artifact was considered to be an equivalent cost to a single mana on a colored card. You still can't really call it power creep though: most overcosted artifacts didn't see play, even in casual, unless they were part of some major combo. They just weren't as big a part of the game back then as they could have been.
Posted By:
longwinded
(9/13/2010 6:17:26 AM)
It's called "Life Matrix." It is meant to represent life.
However, they gave the art commission to Amy Weber - who then did that thing she does.
Yes, nothing represents "life" quite like a skeleton. A dead... skeleton. Ah, well.
Posted By:
Kirbster
(4/25/2011 5:11:41 PM)
Looks like tattoo art.
Posted By:
jumpingjacked
(10/19/2009 1:28:47 PM)
If I'm going to run regeneration, I'd have it as an ability of a creature. Noncreatures that do nothing but regenerate are a waste of a card slot in a deck.
Posted By:
allmighty_abacus
(7/16/2010 3:12:08 PM)
It's a pity this card is so overcosted, since the idea really is kinda cool.
Posted By:
Aquillion
(6/9/2013 12:58:30 AM)