I really liked the older mutant cycle cards, 6 mana, a descent keyword ability, and landcycling in their color.
While reminiscent of them but not as good, they dam well came in handy in the pre-release and I usually will chuck one or two into a color intensive deck for support, they still come in handy.
remember these don't have to search for basic lands so you can use them to grab dual lands too, and for colorless mana as well, I don't really get why this is rated so low. If you cannot afford it, cycle it. If you can, its not a bad defender, the high cost is for utility!
Posted By:
Ava_Adore
(6/2/2011 8:52:44 AM)
Ya know, I think is card is great
If it didn't have defender anyway.
Posted By:
ICEFANG13
(9/13/2011 12:29:51 PM)
why did they give it defender?? anyway, you could put it in a deck if you desperately need mana fixing, like some UW edh.
Posted By:
Arachibutyrophobia
(10/30/2011 5:01:55 PM)
I like to think there's no flavour text because the guys in front of it are lost for words.
Posted By:
Dabir
(5/11/2011 12:46:23 PM)
A less than average card, at least the art work is good.
Posted By:
SavageBrain89
(5/2/2009 11:56:49 AM)
most of these cycler guys in arb are alright for their roles. but defender, come on.
Posted By:
davidhuman
(4/27/2009 2:09:01 PM)
Love the art
Posted By:
Keegan__
(4/25/2009 10:51:06 AM)
6 Mana for a 3/6 doesn't convince me, and making it a defender only makes it worst. The only bright-side is it's land cycle ability. If I had to use or wanted a defender it would be Wall of Denial.
Posted By:
TheLastKawika
(6/28/2009 5:32:56 PM)
i'd rather just play another plains or island in my deck than this
Posted By:
brunsbr103
(10/17/2009 7:46:35 PM)
I Love The Art And The Name Sanctum Plowbeast
Posted By:
MasterOfEtherium
(8/3/2009 11:24:33 PM)