Not the best option, but significantly better in RDW if you're playing Demigod and Flame Javelin.
Posted By:
Judgement-Day
(12/10/2008 10:12:39 AM)
For a while, I thought this was from Coldsnap because of the art =\
Is that smoke or snow?
I don't really understand the art, but awesome card. =D
And @achilleselbow: This is not usurped by Searing Blaze.
Searing Blaze is only 1 dmg insult + 1 dmg injury on your opponent's turn. THIS however. 3 damage insult with maybe a 45% chance of adding 3 injury.
Unless you have fetchlands.. Which means that you're still doing 1 point of damage to yourself. =D
Or Terramorphic Expanse and Evolving Wilds. Those cards are just awesome..
Then late game, when you're not dropping a land a turn, drawing a Searing Blaze isn't that great.. WHEREAS LASH OUT is still consistent. Searing Blaze DOES NOT usurp lash out because of it's inconsistency being worse than Lash Out's inconsistency.
Lash Out/auto... (see all)
Posted By:
Bobmacambob
(1/27/2011 4:59:42 AM)
I still think Clash should have been called "Scry-off!"
Posted By:
DacenOctavio
(1/29/2011 10:23:26 PM)
I rate this card quite high
3 damage to a creature for two mana with a chance to deal 3 damage to a player looks well worth it to me
What really makes this card great is clash, (especially at instant speed) the clash effect itself is scry 1, you can get rid of a situational card you don't need, or you can get rid of that land that might flood your mana.
this is great for multicolor decks that wants to splash a solid red card without being intensive
Definately deserves the rating it has
Posted By:
Ava_Adore
(5/9/2011 10:40:28 AM)
Clash out with your Lash Out.
Posted By:
HuntingDrake
(6/1/2012 7:58:00 PM)
Kind of usurped by Searing Blaze.
Posted By:
achilleselbow
(6/24/2010 9:52:58 PM)
Compare to Magma Jet
Posted By:
armogohma
(7/15/2011 6:45:31 PM)
lol lash out is definitely usurped by searing blaze. if you're going late with a red deck then you're doing it wrong
Posted By:
DGice
(12/21/2011 1:20:51 PM)