x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 2.793 / 5  (46 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
12 >
It's a decent card, nothing extraordinary.

If you're against a deck that can't destroy artifacts then this card ends up paying for itself over and over again, but it's not that good early game.
Posted By: DUDEMIKE (6/2/2010 2:31:22 PM)


Oh, god. This card is fine on its own, but geez, they really messed up on the art and flavor text on the 7th ed. version. And the white border really does not help.
Posted By: The_Murderauder (5/27/2012 12:28:58 AM)


The Visions art is better. The flavor text does not fit this card.
Posted By: A3Kitsune (1/31/2010 10:36:06 PM)


That's the thing about 7th edition. A bunch of old cards with perfectly good art and flavour text, replaced with new, boring to horrible art, and corny, poorly written flavour text.
Posted By: Nagoragama (9/6/2010 6:19:24 PM)


Ur's Golem Eye.
Posted By: Duskdale_Wurm (6/7/2010 12:29:08 AM)


Maybe if it gave you mana of any one color it could be better in multicolored decks
Posted By: TheSwarm (8/6/2010 3:11:51 PM)


I remember getting these in 7th boosters when I didn't really know much about Magic. I hated them. I still hate it, it's bad for the sake of bad.
Posted By: ArtBell (2/11/2010 9:59:32 AM)


Wow. They increase the cost of Sol Ring by 3 and it's still a playable casual card.
Posted By: Shadoflaam (12/22/2011 6:35:22 PM)


At this mana cost, you should use Thran Dynamo instead.
Posted By: nemokara (3/7/2012 11:04:46 AM)


Should have made Sisay's ring legendary and gave it a special ability. Maybe give it good synergy with Captain Sisay, like having it add one white or one green mana to your mana pool and giving all legendary creatures you control +1/+1
Something like that.
Posted By: Captain_Sisay_2591 (5/1/2013 3:55:27 AM)