Turn one: Plains, Steppe Lynx
Turn two: This
3/4 swinging on turn two? Is nice...
Posted By:
Laguz
(10/26/2009 1:25:57 AM)
+2/+0 is the red version. +1/+1 is appropriate for green. it's alright but I like it.
Posted By:
AXER
(1/30/2010 1:32:55 AM)
@Styny: because green/white decks doesn't need red mana. But by all means, run both in red/green decks if you don't mind the "enters the battlefield tapped" part of them.
Posted By:
GrimjawxRULES
(9/14/2010 3:32:05 PM)
This would be so much better if it put a +1/+1 counter on the creature, as is though..meh, it's okay. In a more aggressive deck (as long as it ran {R} ) I'd prefer Teetering Peaks
Posted By:
tcollins
(3/1/2011 10:39:33 PM)
why choose between this and teetering peaks? why not run both?
Posted By:
Styny
(12/27/2009 6:27:17 PM)
Generally, Peaks will be better in aggro, since blocking is unlikely and the extra 1 damage is ussually better than +1 toughness. This card is OK, though.
Posted By:
Fanaticmogg
(2/5/2011 12:57:03 PM)
is nice
Posted By:
Slavir
(9/29/2009 12:22:39 AM)
+2/+0 is more useful though though
Posted By:
OutlawD1
(10/2/2009 10:50:41 AM)
@ outlawD1: It depends on the color of deck you're using this in. In mono-green, this is actually better. But in any deck that runs red, should be using Teetering Peaks instead.
Posted By:
RyanFisher
(12/22/2009 5:10:57 PM)