It looks like a bizzare cross between a stegosaurus and a psychopathic lunatic.
Posted By:
SavageBrain89
(10/3/2009 10:35:40 PM)
There are more Baloths than Wraiths. Why can't they have their own creature type?
Posted By:
Vinifera7
(10/7/2009 3:33:40 PM)
Baloth Woodcrasher's nutty little brother.
Seriously, why Wizards? This and Woodcrasher in the same set? This could of been great...
As it stands, It's still good. Landfall is very powerful, and this and Woodcrasher seem to be built to hammer that home.
Posted By:
WateryMind
(3/22/2011 9:48:08 PM)
Baloth Woodcrasher beats this card hands down.
Posted By:
Bauble
(10/21/2009 8:55:12 AM)
What is this? The poor mans woodcrasher baloth?
Posted By:
MDStrawHat
(2/6/2010 7:33:55 AM)
Worst baloth ever
Posted By:
Slavir
(9/28/2009 11:55:42 PM)
Combos pretty decently with Living Tsumani and Soaring Seacliff in limited.
Posted By:
ninjaboy05
(11/11/2009 1:21:39 PM)
It can increase its power nicely with a landfall deck, but considering what you're getting out of it, and that its only until end of turn with nothing else but making it bigger, it's not especially good. There are other cards at the same mana that are just plain big without using landfall at all.
Posted By:
Donovan_Fabian
(11/23/2009 8:07:54 PM)
He's handy if you don't have anything better, and he's a common.
Woodcrasher is better though.
Posted By:
.Fighter.
(11/25/2009 11:21:18 AM)
Well, at least he gets a boost from landfall.
Posted By:
U-caster
(12/31/2009 3:49:13 PM)