x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 2.827 / 5  (52 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
123 >
"This doesn't have a creature type. It's Nameless."

Oooh, WotC. You clowns.
Posted By: bfugitive (7/20/2011 5:48:53 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I love amusing rulings. This is my favorite, although having "x is redundant" twice is great too.
Posted By: NeoKoda (10/18/2011 4:52:53 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Survives the dreaded Endemic Plague and Skeletal Changeling combo.
Posted By: SirZapdos (5/5/2012 11:13:51 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Wait... is there a typo? the oracle text says it doesn't...
Ohhhhhh... I see what you did there WotC
Posted By: Lord_of_Gelectrodes (9/15/2012 7:20:01 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Saw a guy at fnm tell a noob to run this in his Kinship deck.
Posted By: NuckChorris (10/13/2012 2:12:31 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Certainly not the best card around, but DAMN do I love that flavor. No creature type? Beautiful. 3.5/5 just for that.
Posted By: Continue (11/28/2012 7:48:18 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I really wish this had been reprinted in Lorwyn... came close with nameless inversion, but i really want to see this printed with no creature type.
Posted By: orisiti (12/10/2012 9:28:44 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I know what his race is! It's the Fire Nation!
Posted By: GoOrmot2Go (10/23/2013 2:08:27 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


hahaha! his name should be nameless racist! He doens't like other white guys!

I played this card before Ice age came out and I thought it worked well. Things were different way back when, but he was a bad ass at the time.

Even now in some cases you could get a big huge trampling guy for cheap. It's not a much worse card than channel if you set it up right.
Posted By: badmofo (6/28/2009 11:54:46 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I think them not giving it a type was a flavorful point - it is very neat to have a creature that doesn't have any types. Even if it isn't a very good card, having no creature type at least makes it an interesting card.
Posted By: Guest474596941 (4/21/2009 8:11:10 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0