x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 3.016 / 5  (64 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
12 >
Why isn't it in Knights vs Dragons??
Posted By: ffang (4/7/2011 7:06:04 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I really like this card for several reasons. It's a got the right casting cost for a 2/2, if it stays in play you got a decent creature, and best of all, you could have your opponent waste a removal spell on it instead of the creatures you actually care about.
Posted By: Swiftgamer18 (12/2/2009 5:02:16 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Be sure that two of this guys on table is a pain for your opponents. Good for limited.
Posted By: PolarisDeNexum (5/7/2010 1:04:17 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Pretty cool card. Baisically a Knight Errant who can buff himself in a W/G deck. I've played him a few times and the self buffing is fairly good. Save you mana and attack with him. It's a tough choice for your opponent knowing they either have to let you get a free 2 damage or knowing if they block you'll pump him up to 5/5 and probably kill their blocker.
Posted By: KnightOfSerra (4/9/2011 6:02:11 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Great limited card, and should have replaced White Knight in Knights vs Dragons. The buff would trade for a lot of 5-toughness dragons, and he could theoretically save himself from Thunder Dragon.
Posted By: Equinox523 (6/20/2011 10:01:45 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


When i first saw this card, I thought it was the most terrible thing ever. Then I realised that it's strictly better than Grizzly Bears if they were white, and it's actually killer in limited. A 2-drop that you can dump spare mana into for a 5/5 body is actually a really great option to have.

It's not terrible in BW midrange or ramp either. A solid 3.5/5
Posted By: justicarphaeton (11/25/2010 8:38:03 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


How does Grizzly Bears get like 3.5 when this has less than 2.5? I don't get it. This thing's ability can be such a nightmare for your opponent (attacking on the 4th turn with a 5/5 for gosh sakes).
Posted By: BillyBullshot (10/12/2009 2:05:56 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Grizzly Bears get a higher rating because they're awesome. This dies to "destoy target non-Bear creature" effects and Black Knight has protection from it. Anyway, perfectly decent creature.
Posted By: rubber (2/6/2010 3:33:39 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I love me some strictly better grizzly bears, I tell you what.
Posted By: HairlessThoctar (12/27/2009 2:24:39 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Solid card, reinforces the G/W aggro deck.

The flavour is pretty good, referring to the meddling of Bolas, but I question how it fits in with the mechanic at all.
Posted By: Baconradar (10/5/2011 5:27:01 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0