x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 2.602 / 5  (49 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
All the devour creatures suffer from this sad fate. At least you can give this one trample easily.
Posted By: xStrikerx (7/24/2009 3:59:37 PM)


Thats what Madrush Cyclops is for
Posted By: TwistedNsanity (8/8/2009 2:08:05 PM)


Yeah! I devour all my wimpy creatures to make my viashino into a godzilla sized beast . . . then watch in disappointment as it gets killed by removal.
Posted By: SavageBrain89 (7/6/2009 4:22:45 PM)


Although optional trample is nice, the only real playable viashino and/or critter with devour is obviously Thunder-Thrash Elder because of Devour 3.
Posted By: DacenOctavio (1/7/2011 8:30:57 AM)


I find it funny that the devour ability never mentions that is has to be your creatures sacrificed.
Posted By: Dannyman658 (10/16/2012 12:09:16 AM)


This worked really well in my poorly built haste/burn deck. First turn, I played a haste 1/1 creature and attacked. Second turn, I played quest for pure flame and another 1/1 creature (attacked). Third turn, I played lightning bolt and another 1/1 creature (attacked as well). Luckily, my opponent didn't want to block with his mana ramp creatures. So I had all three creatures to sacrifice to get an 8/8 on turn 4 that can deal double damage because of quest for pure flame.
Devour 1 doesn't make any sense to me though (2 seems alright if you have a bunch of 1/1s).
Posted By: Sswift (8/9/2010 10:36:44 AM)



Maybe because Wizards assume that you would know that you can only ever Sacrifice permanents you control.
Posted By: Moleland (2/27/2014 4:16:30 PM)