People shun auras, but there are ways around their drawbacks. One way is to play enchantress creatures. Creatures like this one here is another way. net loss of 0 cards!
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(7/19/2011 11:45:06 PM)
Those are the longest arms EVER.
Posted By:
TheHandyman
(10/3/2011 9:02:12 PM)
I'd rather have Wall of Blossoms, since this usually simply ends up chump blocking something anyway. Still, it is by no means a bad card.
Posted By:
Tevish_Szat
(6/19/2012 10:29:02 AM)
This guy likes to be bounced.
Posted By:
Stray_Dog
(2/10/2010 8:13:54 PM)
(S)he is adept at managing Stampeding Wildebeests.
Posted By:
ThatStunna
(1/27/2013 5:58:02 PM)
I'm torn.
This is a much more relevant creature type than Wall of Blossoms and capable of attacking when need be, but more often than not, I'd rather block with these guys and Wall of Blossoms has this guy beat in that respect.
Playable regardless.
Posted By:
HairlessThoctar
(3/9/2010 11:28:03 AM)
The world SEVERLY needed this card. I can leave my Pyknite's in the friggin box finally. This is wall of blossoms plus an attacker, AND an elf. very good card.
Posted By:
Shoe2
(11/19/2008 2:17:42 PM)
Solid little filler card. Even in a non elf deck, you still get a chump blocker and dig deeper for your combo. In an elf deck, you get a sexy 1/1 pumpable elf that beefs elf count while replacing itself.
Also krypt, if you enchant this guy and he gets nuked, that is a netloss of 1 card not 0 cards.
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(5/15/2014 9:48:38 PM)