x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 3.926 / 5  (149 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
123 >
Very elegant combination of two common abilities.
Posted By: Orim-s_Thunder (11/24/2009 7:23:03 AM)


the ART! the CHEAP COST! the TURN TWO 2/2! the VIGILANCE! the MANA RAMPING! the RARITY! 3 CREATURE TYPES! absolutely 5 stars!!
Posted By: kronos539 (6/15/2010 8:15:40 PM)


Cheap, solid, turn 2 attacker with vigilance. Nice. Oh and he can tap for mana. Very Nice.
Posted By: thezanet (2/8/2010 2:45:38 PM)


Wow, just a common
Posted By: pixieCrack (6/7/2010 9:01:43 PM)


Amazing mechanical synergy.

I am truly shocked that this design wasn't implemented during either Invasion or Ravnica blocks.
Posted By: HairlessThoctar (2/24/2011 4:53:51 PM)


Man, Greg Staples is a beast.

Anyway, I was wrong about this card. It's excellent.
Posted By: Laguz (7/13/2010 7:33:28 AM)


This can attack AND tap for mana in the same round. It's a fantastic creature any way you slice it. It's hard to get more value than this for just WG. Some people would argue Watchwolf. They may be right. But there are still plenty of reasons to play this instead, and if a card is a viable alternative to something like Watchwolf, then it's definitely fantastic.
Posted By: SleetFox (10/6/2010 2:42:09 PM)


This card is great in so many ways.

The stats are just icing on the cake.
Posted By: NoobOfLore (12/19/2010 11:09:44 PM)


yeah this card is just all sorts of amazing...WHY DON'T I HAVE ANY!!!!!
Posted By: Richochet_Shaman (9/11/2011 9:22:30 AM)


A 2/2 mana producer with vigilance is something that green players with L. Elves have been dreaming of for a long time. And when it comes at such a low cost it is great for early game to deal damage and bring out other spells. Good for combinations and I'm surprised I haven't seen many people use him.
Posted By: Nathan_Pooler (5/29/2009 8:33:29 AM)