Excels primarily in draw-go control, where untapped lands are huge and opponent's turns sometimes pass without you needing to respond~ Mystical Teachings, perhaps? :D
Posted By:
iantewks
(7/26/2011 6:11:39 PM)
Depending on the deck, I'd run either these and or Terramorphic Expanses for cheap mana fixing. If you consider carefully, you can tell that in specific situations, Panoramas and TM Expanses are better for different types of decks.
Posted By:
AlphaNumerical
(8/31/2009 12:57:46 AM)
Colorless EDH deck says Hi.
Posted By:
Doom_Lich
(8/1/2010 8:11:56 PM)
I still like Terramorphic Expanse better than any of the panoramic lands
Posted By:
Owls_and_More_Owls
(8/29/2009 4:54:53 PM)
@elChupacabra: Tundra would not be fetchable, seeing as how it is actually a nonbasic land with two basic land types. It could be destroyed with Flashfires, but not fetched with things that go get basic lands.
In fact, you can even read that ruling by checking the 'Rulings' section right at the bottom of any dual land, which states: "10/1/2008 This has basic land types, but it isn't a basic land. Things that affect basic lands don't affect it. Things that affect basic land types do."
Posted By:
nammertime
(7/6/2010 5:53:03 PM)
Rules question - do the Panorama's text of, for instance, "basic Plains" prevent the panoramas from fetching Dual Lands, such as Tundra? I think that's the case, but I'd like some confirmation on this.
Posted By:
elChupacabra
(5/13/2010 3:07:43 PM)
Has a slight advantage over Terramorphic Expanse and Arcane Sanctum (Can play untapped if necessary), but the cost of getting colored mana is just too great to be worth it, especially since you can't get that mana the turn you activate it.
Posted By:
SleetFox
(1/30/2011 11:39:57 PM)
Awesome artwork, far better than Terramorphic Expanses'.
Posted By:
FragNutMK1
(3/22/2010 2:00:25 AM)