x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 2.614 / 5  (57 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
12 >
Not strictly better than Zap; this doesn't combo with things like Pyromancer Ascension, Chandra, the Firebrand, Reverberate or Kiln Fiend.
Posted By: BegleOne (8/17/2011 7:13:59 AM)


Not as bad as said here. Uncounterable Zap, or efficient creature? Sounds good.
Posted By: Designer_Genes (10/16/2009 9:27:20 PM)



Is that why half of the ranking tournament decks are Jund?
Posted By: VirtueVsVice (10/20/2009 1:49:31 PM)


Zap was playable in limited in certain situations, so you don't need to actually be able to play this clunky card. Uncounterable damage is nice, too.
Posted By: ZEvilMustache (4/26/2009 7:58:52 AM)


I'm giving this an honourable mention for being the only one of the Sojourners that isn't absolutely awful!
Posted By: Asinine-Ultimatum (5/22/2009 5:15:00 PM)


Jund really didn't get the love that grixis got, did it... =(
Posted By: Cenelder (4/30/2009 8:48:55 PM)


wow.. this is only slightly better than a flare...
Posted By: spoonish (5/10/2009 8:42:56 AM)


this is baaad crapy art,nothing of jund at all and it`s just ....well crap
Posted By: Iiory (7/27/2009 2:06:38 AM)


Strictly better than Zap. Prove me wrong?
Posted By: DacenOctavio (2/3/2011 11:36:27 PM)


Not bad. A CMC of BRG for a 3/2 in case you need some creature to beat out, this isn't hard for a Jund deck provided you have the right lands. The cycling ability, believe me when I said this, that one card draw and that one damage determines your success or failures in a match.
Posted By: SorianSadaskan (5/6/2010 10:23:25 PM)