x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 2.469 / 5  (32 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
It reminds me of a tsunami... that is living.
Posted By: Mudbutt_on (1/8/2010 11:08:28 PM)


Izzet, you sir, shall be corrected. If this creature is stolen from you (Ritual of the machine?) the opponent may not be able to pay the upkeep. Strict worsiness revoked!
Posted By: Kryptnyt (12/31/2010 3:05:19 PM)


Wow, one of the few cards able to claim to be strictly worse than another (barring type). Same size and cost, both fly, but this has a more strict upkeep cost. Congratulations, Waterspout Djinn, you can claim to be strictly worse than Living Tsunami. A rare honor in magic :)
Posted By: izzet_guild_mage (6/2/2010 10:01:58 PM)


and yet, who would take control of this card, unless they planned on saccing it anyway?
Posted By: BastianQoU (6/28/2011 10:57:01 PM)


actually this is now pretty good, I mean guaranteed landfall triggers who wouldn't want it
Posted By: Wormfang (4/7/2011 5:41:30 PM)


Most times when a player takes control of something, they have a choice on what to take control of. I wouldn't steal a creature which would return to hand the next upkeep because I couldn't pay costs.
Posted By: wholelottalove (10/22/2012 5:41:04 AM)


That is some irrelevant flavor.
Posted By: BrokenArms (11/16/2013 5:36:13 AM)