Reminds me of another innuendo saturated enchantment, Earthbind....
Posted By:
TheTraitorKing
(2/28/2010 12:52:37 PM)
I'll give this card a 2, but only because I was once killed by it. Sure that was due mostly to my lousy draws, but still; having my Steel Golem enchanted with this and Curse of Chains was depressing.
Posted By:
TinGorilla
(6/8/2010 11:49:21 PM)
Nice art.
Posted By:
Ulamog
(7/17/2010 5:27:41 AM)
Wanderlust always was out of color.
Posted By:
divine_exodus
(8/3/2011 12:44:09 PM)
Anyone who comments about "auras need to cost less because of card disadvantage" on auras that aren't for boosting creatures need to stop being parrots. The only time this is card disadvantage is if they destroy their creature in response to this, in which case, congrats, you just got to destroy a creature for . And if not, well it's not a great card for sure, but complaining about card disadvantage is just stupid.
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(6/1/2013 12:05:42 PM)
@outlaw: That only applies to auras that you put on your own creatures. Because to get rid of this, they'd have to use removal on their own creature, granting card advantage.
The card itself isn't good enough for it mana cost, but that's not why.
Posted By:
klaff
(2/25/2010 5:21:32 PM)
Wow. The flavor text is filthy...
Posted By:
car2n
(6/14/2010 1:59:22 PM)
Hahaha, now you've only got 20 turns to win!
Posted By:
Laguz
(5/22/2010 10:58:32 PM)
Wanderlust in black, except it can't be CoP'd.
Posted By:
bhunji42
(9/30/2009 6:59:23 PM)