"Like all priests, she gives her blessings only to those truly worthy of them.
Unlike some others, her blessings suck."
Posted By:
TherealphatMatt
(9/19/2011 5:03:34 AM)
Blightspeaker only costs more to cast, has 1 more Power, and only has to tap in order to use his ability.
Posted By:
Vinifera7
(7/11/2009 1:30:40 PM)
I prefer Orzhov Guildmage, at least I might be able to turn out 2 damage each turn.
All the pingers are much better than this card.
Posted By:
DragonLord132
(8/31/2009 8:27:58 PM)
When given the choice between this card and Swamp during an M10 draft, I always pick the Swamp, that way I can't accidentally use this card in my deck.
Posted By:
LordZogar
(7/30/2009 8:38:14 AM)
surprisingly playable in limited ; )
Posted By:
Ajani_is_da_man
(11/22/2009 5:13:20 PM)
They could've at least made it a 1/1 for 1 with a overcosted ability
Posted By:
person1234
(8/17/2009 5:06:01 PM)
what if you draw something you cant use? i would use it as a late gamebreaker, not an early chump blocker as there are cards that are definitively better for the same cost
Posted By:
darkfury
(10/4/2009 3:58:24 PM)
I wish I could have been a fly on the wall when the play testers decided the activated ability needed to be so expensive. What sort of arguments were made? Was "BT:" just too close to playable?
Posted By:
ZEvilMustache
(7/11/2009 5:42:44 AM)
Pinging your opponent to death used to be great, back in the days of the Prodigal Sorcerer. She isn't totally awful for this, as she does her damage as "lifeloss" so anti-damage effects won't work.
While it isn't the worst card I've ever seen, it certainly is not great. Compare this to something like Guul Draz Vampire for the same cost, and I know which one I'd rather have on my side.
Passable at best, 1.5/5
Posted By:
Gaussgoat
(1/13/2010 7:15:40 AM)