x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 3.083 / 5  (48 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
123 >
Name "Nausea" wasn't Evil enough ?
Posted By: True_Smog (4/28/2010 7:42:22 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


looks useful in limited to kill off eldrazi token spawns all at once.

Otherwise infest is probably better.
Posted By: mdakw576 (4/16/2010 3:13:36 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


To answer those arguing about Shrivel over Nausea... Maybe it was to add to the feel of the set and give a counterbalance to Magnify.
Posted By: masonthekiller (11/13/2010 7:11:28 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Great against Conqueror's Pledge.

I hate you, masterofEtherium. Why do you post these things? Whenever I see a nasty comment, I look at the user and... it's always you. I've never seen one that's not you.
Posted By: land_comment (3/27/2011 2:31:42 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Compare to Consume the Meek.
Posted By: ZuesAscendant (10/30/2010 1:45:17 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@DoctorKenneth
I use to wholeheartedly agree with you. Functional reprints purely for flavor seemed a bit excessive and borderline greedy (as you had to buy the new ones if you wanted to compete in T2) but then I started to play EDH. The Singleton formats love functional reprints (as long as it was a good card to start with) as you now can get past the restriction of only one per deck. Yeah, the fact we have 7 Grizzly Bears and 5 Gray Ogres is a bit ridiculous as not many players even look at those cards, much less play them. But I wouldn't mind playing a pair of these in a Mono-Black EDH if my play group was token heavy.
Posted By: OmegaSerris (12/10/2011 6:22:43 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


another reason for not making a reprint of a old card is so you can have more then 4 per deck, I see no problem with it
Posted By: Aradimar (10/8/2010 10:27:36 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


And Nausea was a bad name because...? Functional reprints lately are just striking me as odd. I mean, yes, yes, artifact creatures and the like can't flavourfully get sick, but note my comments on Essence Scatter. There will always be flavour offenders. Get over it, you can't fix them all. This set alone has a chariot that Walls can ride around in. No one cares that you can pull off absurdities like this. No one needs to explain why a kid in a frog suit (Glider Barin) makes the mighty Nicol Bolas, Planeswalker, so immensely happy (though maybe there's something he's not telling us). Please, Wizards. You don't need to "fix" any more cards. If you want a reprint, just reprint it.
Posted By: DoctorKenneth (4/16/2010 10:11:35 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I'm just posting here to express my love for DoctorKenneth's comment here. I salute you, sir, you truly are a gentleman and a scholar.
Posted By: True_Mumin (4/28/2010 7:41:15 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@Guntz I'm pretty sure Wizards makes more money for themselves by making cohesive flavourful sets than it would by making functional reprints of 5 cent cards for no reason. Personally I prefer the image of Eldrazi "shriveling" populations to them killing everyone with a nasty bout of food poisoning. =p
Posted By: Prizrak (7/24/2011 12:19:52 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 




Gatherer works better in the Companion app!

Continue