Wrap in Flames
x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 2.936 / 5  (39 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
1, 2 >
I think i know what you mean ZEvilMustache, but then again if it would have read something like "Choose up to three target creatures, then choose one or both - Wrap in Flames deals 1 damage to each of those creatures; or those creatures can't block this turn.", it would have been far too complicated for a simple common.
A card with a wording like that should have taken an uncommon slot instead. Something like Akoum Boulderfoot could have taken in this card's common slot then instead, but now we have this rather simple little burn spell instead.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: Mode (4/19/2010 12:45:05 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


While Panic Attack almost always sucked, I like how this card gives you options. You can pick off their chump blockers and/or attack past their fatties and walls.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: Vinifera7 (4/19/2010 6:47:04 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@ZEvilMustache. . . I'd rather take two instead of one!
Report Abuse  
Posted By: EvilCleavage (4/23/2010 8:24:23 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


There is, of course, a reason Eldrazi Spawn is getting it in the art.

Nice and flexible.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: Tanaka348 (4/17/2010 11:03:56 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I just love how necessarily complicated the wording on this card is. Not sure how good it is yet, but killing up to 3 small creatures and even stopping 3 creatures from blocking can be powerful.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: CrimsonVoid (4/16/2010 3:51:33 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I feel like it could have said "1 damage to three creatures OR three creatures can't block." But I can imagine a rare situation where you might want some combination of the two.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: ZEvilMustache (4/18/2010 4:35:22 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I think this is pretty good. There are a lot of 1 toughness creatures you want to kill in this format, and a lot of big dudes you want to get past blockers.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: badmalloc (5/20/2010 2:00:44 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Kill their Eldrazi spawn, or prevent their big eldrazis from blocking, what's not to like?
Report Abuse  
Posted By: Sironos (5/30/2010 1:41:32 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Not sure if this card is effective as intended, because isn't it possible just to sacrifice an Eldrazi token that is targeted to "fizzle" this spell? Isn't that how stop someone getting a rebound from Staggershock-ing your Eldrazi token?

Please someone explain this to me if i am incorrect. Thanks!
Report Abuse  
Posted By: InResponse85 (6/9/2010 2:02:21 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I wish they would just make a nice solid Falter like spell though.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: Tommy9898 (6/16/2010 9:23:35 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 




We have updated our privacy policy. Click the link to learn more.

Gatherer works better in the Companion app!

Continue