x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 3.205 / 5  (39 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
 >
Fits in any deck that desires card disadvantage.
Posted By: scumbling1 (3/4/2011 9:57:01 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


FIts in nearly any deck, good for filling spots with something that can always come in handy.
Posted By: Sironos (5/22/2010 11:24:38 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


cheap and easy to use
Posted By: dreadedblue (7/4/2009 9:41:48 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@marmaris74

Facepalm for missing the sarcasm.
Posted By: ScepterofEternities (8/15/2011 9:35:46 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@marmaris74

Facepalm for not being able to read. "disadvantage" != "advantage".
Posted By: PeabodyET (8/31/2011 12:36:46 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Think about this. It's essentially a 2-power creature with haste, assuming you already have a creature out and active. Sure, it's card disadvantage, but it's rare to win with an Aggro deck by making sure never to play more than one creature at a time, for fear of Warth of God. It also fits well with Black's philosophy of taking any risk and paying any cost to win.
Posted By: Fanaticmogg (3/6/2012 9:49:23 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@scumbling1
Where do you see card advantage? I'm not saying this card isn't great, but letting my opponent's Terminate kill two of my permanents is not "card advantage."

Edit:
@scumbling1
Facepalm for changing your comment from "advantage" to "disadvantage" without informing others that it's an edit. My original comment was at Scumbling1 because his had said "card advantage," which this card so clearly does not provide.

@ScepterOfEternities
Facepalm for incorrectly accusing me of "missing the sarcasm." If Scumbling had been sarcastic, he wouldn't have needed to correct his comment.
Posted By: marmaris74 (4/8/2012 8:08:08 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@ marmaris74

Lmao at your awkward-ass comment.

More importantly sickest art ever for this card...if youre keen on playing it but are concerned about card DISadvantage just slap it on top of the rancor atop your troll ascetic...or even on your will-o'-the-wisp. yeah, that should do it.
Posted By: patronofthesound (3/3/2013 8:53:05 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Most decks run some form of removal, and this walks into 2 for 1's pretty frequently. The risk/reward is not high enough to justify running this aura.

In limited or kitchen table, sure. But if you want to be competitive look past this card.
Posted By: TheWrathofShane (2/28/2014 7:35:16 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


For a fun time, gradually go through each version of this card's art over the years and read people's reactions.
Posted By: Tribor (3/5/2014 10:19:19 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0