x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 4.068 / 5  (22 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
 >
Wildfires 5-8, except really expensive :P
Posted By: Maraxas-of-Keld (2/15/2010 11:24:55 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Because Meddling Mage
Posted By: Kryptnyt (7/21/2011 7:15:37 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@SilverSkyz: ...or you yourself could play with Darksteel Citadels or Darksteel Garrisons, so I don't see how this is worse.
Posted By: Tiggurix (10/14/2012 12:03:25 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This card is overpriced. Why would you need more than four Wildfires in your deck?
Posted By: Chrysologus (7/23/2010 7:15:26 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


It's not Wildfire
Wildfire made each player sacrifice land. This destroys it.
Wildfire affected every player, this is only one target other player.
normally this doesn't matter, but if you're playing a group game or your opponent has Darksteel Citadels then this is strictly worse.
Posted By: SIlverSkyz (9/19/2010 9:24:06 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This WAS wildfire before 2009. >:( One good time to put more than four wildfires in your deck is when resolving wildfire wins you the game.
Posted By: Knifethrower (5/19/2011 11:59:09 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@SilverSkyz:
Indestructible lands can't be chosen for destruction. So sayeth the almighty rulings!

Also, I like how this was printed despite Wildfire having been printed in Portal Second Age.
Posted By: Ragamander (1/12/2012 12:13:16 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0